FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M290X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M290X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M290X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M290X has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M290X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M290X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 160 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M290X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2800 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Neptune |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Check Price |