GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M290X
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M290X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M290X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M290X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M290X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 446 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M290X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 93 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Fortnite is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200 | Neptune |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Check Price |