Radeon R9 M290X vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M290X and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M290X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M290X | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Radeon R9 M290X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M290X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 183 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Radeon R9 M290X and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M290X | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Neptune | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 January 2014 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Check Price |