Radeon R9 M290X vs Tesla T4
When choosing between Radeon R9 M290X and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M290X and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M290X | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M290X has 42% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- Radeon R9 M290X is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M290X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 265 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8800 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M290X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M290X | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | GCN | Turing |
Code name | Neptune | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2014 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Check Price |