GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M295X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M295X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M295X.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 95 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
Code name | GK106 | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |