GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M295X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R9 M295X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R9 M295X.
GeForce GTX 950A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 270 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3 |
Code name | GM107 | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GTX 950A vs FirePro S9000
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro S9000