Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R9 M295X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Radeon R9 M295X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon HD 4870 X2 stacks up against Radeon R9 M295X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 14% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 23 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M295X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 3 |
Code name | R700 | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2008 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs FirePro S9000
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro S9000