Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon R9 M295X
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon R9 M295X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7670A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M295X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 455% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 123 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M295X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M295X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Turks | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2012 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 480 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |