Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon R9 M295X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Radeon R9 M295X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Radeon R9 M295X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | Not Listed | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 3 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 3 |
Code name | Kaveri Spectre | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 14 January 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 | Not Listed |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs FirePro S9000
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro S9000