Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R9 M295X
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M270X and Radeon R9 M295X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M270X will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M295X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M270X | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M295X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M295X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R9 M270X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M295X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M295X.
- Radeon R9 M270X and Radeon R9 M295X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 421% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M270X | Radeon R9 M295X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Venus | Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 21 March 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | Not Listed | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
FreeSync | + | + |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | + |
PowerTune | + | + |
DualGraphics | + | + |
ZeroCore | + | + |
Switchable graphics | + | + |
Mantle | + | + |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M295X vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M270X vs FirePro S9000
- Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M295X vs FirePro S9000