FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 M360
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M360.
Radeon R9 M360
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 175 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 29% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |