GeForce 825M vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 136% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK208 | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |