GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon R9 M360
When choosing between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 M360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 M360.
Radeon R9 M360
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 28% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GE | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Check Price |