GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 137% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tropo | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon R7 M465X
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon HD 7750
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7750