GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 M360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
Radeon R9 M360
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tropo |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |