Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |