Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R9 M360
When comparing Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 M360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 M360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M360
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 28% more, than Quadro 4000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |