Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R9 M360
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M360 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 87% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |