Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R9 M360 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 105 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |