Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 M360
When choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M360.
Radeon R9 M360
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M360 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7750
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7750