Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
Radeon R9 M360
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 275 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 2475 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 136% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | Tropo |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |