Radeon Pro 450 vs Radeon R9 M360
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon R9 M360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 450 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M360
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M360 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3955 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 450 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Check Price |