Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R9 M360
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M360
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M360 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M360. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |