FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M365X
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2475 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 17% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Tropo |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |