GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M365X

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M365X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M365X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon R9 M365X here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Radeon R9 M365X Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	130−140
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	6−7
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 73% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	24−27
medium / 768p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture	G9x	GCN
Code name	N10E-GS1	Tropo
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	6 May 2015
Pipelines	64	640
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	37.00
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	1,184 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	Not Listed
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	PCIe 3.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M365X

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M365X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares