GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M365X
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 126 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200B | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870