GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Radeon R9 M365X, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 121 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2883 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF114 | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870