Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R9 M365X

In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 M365X are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 M365X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or Radeon R9 M365X here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 3000M Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
  • Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 6−7
ultra / 1080p 1−2 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 16−18
medium / 1080p 4−5 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro 3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro 3000M Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture Fermi GCN
Code name Fermi Tropo
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Release date 22 February 2011 6 May 2015
Pipelines 240 640
Core clock speed 450 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 925 MHz
Transistor count 1,950 million 1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 18.00 37.00
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 1,184 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 625 MHz 1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 72 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
OpenCL 1.1 Not Listed
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.1
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 28 Mh/s
Laptop size large medium sized
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
DualGraphics +
ZeroCore +
Switchable graphics +
Mantle +
Compute units 10
  Check Price Check Price