Quadro K2000 vs Radeon R9 M365X

In this comparison between Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2000 Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:

Radeon R9 M365X Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000	Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	6−7
ultra / 1080p	4−5	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	16−18
medium / 1080p	9−10	8−9
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	130−140
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	55−60	50−55
QHD / 1440p	30−35	27−30
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
high / 768p	85−90	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	80−85	80−85
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	9−10	8−9
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	20−22	18−20
medium / 1080p	9−10	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
low / 720p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	55−60	50−55
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	5−6	4−5
ultra / 1080p	3−4	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	95−100	95−100
high / 1080p	90−95	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	90−95	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−12	10−12
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	27−30	24−27
medium / 768p	18−20	16−18
high / 1080p	10−11	9−10
ultra / 1080p	6−7	6−7
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	20−22	18−20
high / 768p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000	Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK107	Tropo
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2013	6 May 2015
Pipelines	384	640
Core clock speed	954 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	37.00
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	1,184 gflops
Length	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	24 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon R9 M365X

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares