Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M365X
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |