Radeon HD 6550A vs Radeon R9 M365X
In this comparison between Radeon HD 6550A and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6550A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 6550A
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6550A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6550A.
- Radeon HD 6550A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 6550A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.
- Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 6550A is 475 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 73% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6550A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
Code name | Pinewood | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 February 2011 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 627 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.20 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |