Radeon R9 M365X vs Tesla M6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 M365X stacks up against Tesla M6, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M6
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M365X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 30 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 388% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 307% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 430% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 340% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 415% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |