FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M370X
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M370X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M370X.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M370X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 50 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M370X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 900 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M370X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M370X in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M370X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | RV770 | Cape Verde |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 19 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1500 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |