GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 M370X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R9 M370X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R9 M370X.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R9 M370X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 115 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R9 M370X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 1508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Cape Verde |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 27 September 2013 | 19 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1500 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 156 Mh/s | 125 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs FirePro S10000
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Radeon R9 M370X vs FirePro S10000
- Radeon R9 M370X vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Tesla M2070 Q
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GeForce GTX 760A
- Radeon R9 M370X vs Tesla M2070 Q
- Radeon R9 M370X vs GeForce GTX 760A