Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 M370X
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R9 M370X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon R9 M370X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 87 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M370X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Cape Verde |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 November 2016 | 19 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1500 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | 125 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon R9 M370X vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon R9 M370X vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 760A
- Radeon R9 M370X vs Tesla M2070 Q
- Radeon R9 M370X vs GeForce GTX 760A