Radeon R9 M370X vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M370X and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M370X will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- Radeon R9 M370X is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M370X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 215 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 5500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Cape Verde | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 May 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1500 Million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 254.4 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |