GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 575 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 64 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |