GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R9 M375X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R9 M375X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 mobile stacks up against Radeon R9 M375X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 470 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon R9 M375X vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI