GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R9 M375X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M375X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M375X
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 375 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 175 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |