Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M375X
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M375X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M375X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M375X
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI