Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R9 M375X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M375X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M375X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 113 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |