Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 M375X
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M375X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M375X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 650 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 40.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 5850
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI