FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M380
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380.
FirePro W5100
Radeon R9 M380 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M380 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M380 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M380 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M380 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M380 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M380 is 70 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M380.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M380 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M380 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Bonaire | Strato Pro GDDR5 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 194 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |