Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R9 M380
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon R9 M380, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T1000 stacks up against Radeon R9 M380, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
Radeon R9 M380 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M380 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M380 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 M380 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M380 - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M380 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 395 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M380.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M380 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M380.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R9 M380 | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Code name | TU117 | Strato Pro GDDR5 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 194 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |