Radeon R9 M380 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M380 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M380 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M380 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M380 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M380 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M380.
- Radeon R9 M380 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M380 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M380 is 426 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1488 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M380.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| Radeon R9 M380 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M380 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M380 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Strato Pro GDDR5 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 194 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |