FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 M385

In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M385 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M385 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M385 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Radeon R9 M385 here:

Main Specs

  FirePro M5950 Radeon R9 M385
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
  • FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
  • FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
  • FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M385 is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 4−5 10−12
ultra / 1080p 2−3 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
low / 720p 14−16 24−27
medium / 1080p 6−7 12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro M5950.

Full Specs

  FirePro M5950 Radeon R9 M385
Architecture Terascale 2 GCN
Code name Whistler-XT Strato
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Release date 13 April 2011 16 June 2015
Pipelines 480 896
Core clock speed 725 MHz
Boost Clock 1100 MHz
Transistor count 716 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 17.40 56.00
Floating-point performance 696.0 gflops 1,792 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz 1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth 57 GB/s 76.8 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.0 6.3
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 Not Listed
Vulkan N/A
FreeSync +
Bus support n/a PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 67 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
DualGraphics +
TrueAudio +
ZeroCore +
Switchable graphics +
Mantle +
Form factor MXM-A
  Check Price Check Price