FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M385
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M385. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Bonaire | Strato |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon R7 260X
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M