FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M385

In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 M385 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Radeon R9 M385 Check Price

Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:

Radeon R9 M385 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R9 M385
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 M385 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 2500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	10−12
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	18−20	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W600 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	150−160	170−180
medium / 768p	120−130	140−150
ultra / 1080p	60−65	75−80
QHD / 1440p	30−35	40−45
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−33
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	65−70	75−80
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−11	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	80−85
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	5−6	7−8
ultra / 1080p	4−5	5−6
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	90−95
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−105
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	20−22
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	30−33	35−40
medium / 768p	18−20	24−27
high / 1080p	10−12	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
high / 768p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Radeon R9 M385
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Code name	Cape Verde	Strato
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 June 2012	16 June 2015
Pipelines	512	896
Core clock speed	750 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	56.00
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,792 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
TrueAudio		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Radeon R9 M385

Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares