GeForce 920A vs Radeon R9 M385
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M385 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 502 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 272% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GK208B | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |