GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M385
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M385, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M385.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 254% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 182% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 288% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 272% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M385. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | TU117 | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 56.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M